Debt Owed | Our Fee |
---|---|
< £1,000 | £125 + VAT |
£1,000 - £10,000 | £200+ VAT |
£10,000 and over | £250 + VAT |
Debt Owed | Our Fee | Court Fee | Recoverable from Debtor (Court Fee + Fixed Costs) |
---|---|---|---|
<£1,000 | £110 + VAT | £25 - £60 | £75 - £130 |
£1,000 - £10,000 | £175 + VAT | £70 - £410 | £150 - £510 |
£10,000 - £100,000 | £275 + VAT | 5% of claim value | Court Fee + £100 |
£100,000 - £200,000 | £350 + VAT | 5% of claim value | Court Fee +100 |
Debt Owed | Our Fee |
---|---|
£750 - £10,000 | £250 + VAT* |
£10,000 and over | £300 + VAT* |
Enforcement Action | Our Fee | Court Fee |
---|---|---|
Application for order that the debtor attends court for questioning | £100 + VAT | Court fee of £55 + process server's fee (£60 - £99 approximately) |
Application for Writ of control - High Court Bailiff (where debt exceeds £600) | £100 + VAT | If unsuccessful: £66 Court fee (Court + bailiff's fee recoverable from debtor) |
Application for an Attachment of Earnings order | £100 + VAT | Court fee of £110 |
Application for Third Party Debt Order | £100 + VAT |
Court fee of £110 Representation at court - estimated at £300 |
Application for Charging Order on Debtor's Property | Charged based on an hourly rate basis (we will provide an estimate based on the circumstances of the debt owed) |
Court fee of £110 Land Registry fee of £40 Representation at court -estimated at £300 |
It is usual for a property lease to contain a provision enabling the freeholder (also known as the landlord) to review and amend the ground rent after a certain period of time. The increase may be expressly set out in the lease, for example as a percentage, or by reference to an inflation-measuring index.
However, an increasing number of leases now contain review clauses that provide for an automatic doubling of the ground rent, in some cases as often as every ten years. This has been especially prevalent among some property developers, who have been routinely selling new-build houses as leaseholds rather than freeholds, and inserting an escalating ground rent clause into the leases. Once the development is finished, the freehold is then sold to a property investor who receives the ground rent every year and is not obliged to maintain any common areas on the development.
What is the problem?At first glance an escalating ground rent clause may not appear to be a problem; it is reasonable to expect that rents will increase to avoid the freeholder losing out from the effects of inflation. However, over the lifetime of a 150-year lease with the ground rent doubling every 10 years, by the end of the lease the ground rent will have escalated from the original by some 819,200%. In real terms, such a lease with a starting ground rent of £200 per year would finish with a rent of £3,276,800 per year.
Increased awareness of the damaging potential of these clauses has meant that they are frequently a problem for prospective purchasers of leasehold properties. A leasehold interest in a property inherently loses value over time as the remaining term of the lease reduces; a 100-year lease will always be more valuable than a 50-year lease of the same property on the same terms. When combined with an escalating ground rent clause, these properties can become unattractive to potential buyers.
Mortgage lenders have also become increasingly wary of these clauses, with many refusing to lend on properties with rent review clauses that they consider to be onerous.
What are my options?Unfortunately, many leaseholders who have an escalating ground rent clause in their lease are not aware of the existence of the clause until they attempt to sell their property or extend their lease.
Some cases, landlords may agree to new, less onerous rent review clauses either as part of a lease extension or by way of a Deed of Variation to an existing lease. Our conveyancing solicitors are able to assist with both of these matters. However, these negotiations are not guaranteed to be straightforward, and in some cases unscrupulous freeholders have attempted to increase the rate at which the ground rent increases rather than accepting reduced terms. Negotiating a variation of a lease as part of a sale transaction is also likely to incur delays for the whole chain.
It is the responsibility of a conveyancer to fully explain the implications of the terms of a lease and other title documentation to their client when acting on a purchase. Failure to do so may constitute a breach of the solicitor’s duty of care, and is likely to give rise to a claim in professional negligence. Our solicitors have experience of such claims against other legal professionals, and our expertise in conveyancing gives us the necessary understanding of how you should have been advised when making the original purchase. It is important to note that limitation is often an issue in these claims; generally speaking, claims against solicitors must be brought within six years of the conclusion of your matter (known as the limitation period). It is therefore in your interests to bring a claim as soon as possible.
If you believe that your lease has an onerous escalating ground rent clause and you were not properly advised of this at the time of purchasing your property, please contact us today for a free no obligation consultation by calling either our London or High Wycombe offices on the telephone numbers referred to at the top of this page, or by email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. We will always get back to you.
Our solicitors have significant experience in all aspects of construction, particularly in disputes. We regularly act for clients in adjudication, arbitration, court litigation and mediations, and are often prepared to act on a no win, no fee basis.
Please contact us today for a free no-obligation telephone discussion by calling us on one of the two telephone numbers at the top of this page, or by email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Arbitration is an alternative to court proceedings which aims to find a final binding award usually in favour of one of the parties. Arbitration is based on the parties agreement: all parties must agree to submit the dispute in question to arbitration.
An arbitrator conducts the arbitration and will be an individual with professional expertise in assisting in the resolution of disputes. An arbitrator can be appointed by agreement between the parties or by an independent nominating body. The arbitrator will make a decision at the end of the arbitration like a judgement, which is final and enforceable.
The arbitrator will conduct the arbitration in a fair and impartial manner, obtaining position statements and evidence from the parties and will hold hearings to review the parties positions. Arbitration is conducted according to the agreed rules of the Arbitration Act 1996, and the outcome of the arbitration can be appealed on a point of law to the courts.
The main benefit of arbitration is the flexibility it provides the parties, as it is not governed by rules of procedures so it can be much less formal than court proceedings. If the parties desire, the arbitrator can recommend solutions to the parties instead of making a final decision. Arbitration is also more flexible for the parties than court procedures in that they usually choose where the arbitration is to take place and the parties can also choose their own rules to govern the procedure of the arbitration.
Our solicitors have significant experience in all aspects of construction, particularly in disputes. We regularly act for clients in adjudication, arbitration, court litigation and mediations, and are often prepared to act on a no win, no fee basis.
Please contact us today for a free no-obligation telephone discussion by calling us on one of the two telephone numbers at the top of this page, or by email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Adjudication provides a quick and inexpensive solution to many disputes arising under a construction contract. It is designed to produce a remedy during the process of a construction project to avoid the problem of long court litigation, which many sub-contractors and small construction companies are unable to afford.
Adjudication is appropriate for resolving financial disputes relating to delay and disruption claims, extension of time claims, final accounts disputes and can be particularly helpful in sorting out disputes on interim applications. Although it has been available since 1998, many contractors still have not taken advantage of the benefits offered by the adjudication procedure.
The legal right to adjudicate is a right that the parties cannot contract out of. A party to a construction contract has the right to refer a dispute to adjudication at any time. The Adjudicators decisions are also binding on the parties until the dispute is finally determined by legal proceedings, by arbitration or by agreement.
There are many benefits of adjudication:
It must be borne in mind that the costs of adjudication cannot be recovered from their opponent even if the adjudication is successful.
Our solicitors have significant experience in all aspects of construction, particularly in disputes. We regularly act for clients in adjudication, arbitration, court litigation and mediations, and are often prepared to act on a no win, no fee basis.
Please contact us today for a free no-obligation telephone discussion by calling us on one of the two telephone numbers at the top of this page, or by email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
A commercial landlord has the right to forfeit a lease where a tenant is in breach of a covenant.
A tenant’s security of tenure is protected by legislation however the landlord’s right to terminate the lease by exercising the right of forfeiture is preserved within that legislation (Landlord and Tenant Act 1954).
The right to forfeit and re-enter premises is essentially contractual and there must be a clause to that effect within the lease.
For all breaches other than rent arrears there is a formal procedure to be followed before forfeiture can take place (Section 146 Law of Property Act 1925).
Rent arrears are specifically excluded from the section 146 procedure however the landlord must formally demand the rent prior to forfeiture unless the lease makes it clear that no demand is necessary. In practice we would usually recommend that a formal demand be made.
In rent arrears cases it is also important to check the lease to establish how long the rent must be unpaid before forfeiture can be carried out. Most modern leases contain a clause for forfeiture and re-entry subject to rent being unpaid for either 14 or 28 days.
Exercising a right of forfeiture and re-entry demonstrates a landlord’s intention to terminate the lease and can be effected in 2 ways:
Peaceable re-entry is only available in the case of a breach of the covenant to pay rent. All other claims for forfeiture for breaches of covenant must be pursued via the courts following service of any appropriate notices.
Once forfeiture has been effected there is provision for the tenant to apply to the court for relief. In most cases the courts will grant the tenant relief from forfeiture provided the tenant has rectified the breach e.g. paid any rent arrears in full, together with interest and any costs due.
The law surrounding forfeiture of a commercial tenancy is a complex area of law. There are procedural issues that must be followed or there is a risk that a landlord will lose their right to forfeiture and a tenant will lose their right to relief. Our lawyers are experienced at guiding client’s through this process, taking the necessary procedural steps and advising upon the do’s and don’ts that can affect the claim.
Please contact us today for a free no obligation telephone discussion by calling us on one of the two telephone numbers referred to at the top of this page, or by email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Our Dispute Resolution Team